patching...
Update: Addicted to Facebook? We're there: www.facebook.com/yorkvillepatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Yorkville Cusd 115

Monday, February 25, 2013

CUSD 115 Board to Vote on Baseball Field Agreement with Yorkville Athletic Association

Meeting begins at 4 p.m. at the district offices.

Yorkville CUSD 115 Board officials will vote to approve a 10 year agreement between Yorkville Athletic Association, NFP and Yorkville School District for a baseball field at Grande Reserve Elementary School. The YAA, which fields the Yorkville Fury, plans to use the field four nights a week from March 15-July 15 and on Saturdays and Sundays during the same time period. The 10 year rental agreement is valued between $30,000 and $35,000. Under the proposal the YAA will be responsible for field preparation prior to any game and the school district will be responsible for maintaining the grass. The board will also vote to renew the district's insurance consultant contract with GCG for a third year beginning April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014…

Monday, December 24, 2012

D115 Passes Tax Levy

Board unanimously supports proposal during Dec. 17 meeting.

Yorkville CUSD 115 School Board of Education officials unanimously adopted a $47,018,000 tax levy Dec. 17. The total 2011 levy was $44,254,548, 6.24 percent less than the proposed 2012 levy. Estimated property taxes in the 2012 levy are $5,389,538, according to district documents. That is a 6.91 percent increase over the $5,041,065 in property taxes in the 2011 levy. The school district is the largest recipient of property taxes levied in Yorkville. By law, every school district is allowed to levy, or ask for, more taxes than they will collect, based on a formula utilizing the assessment of a property and the consumer price index. Board President Dave Dockstader told Patch in 2011 that 82 percent of the district’s revenue stream comes from…

Comment_arrow

Audity

5:30 pm on Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Good try, Tim! Well done. But, I did read the footote of your page, that's how I found the one I posted. Just because there was a .6% increase in one month does not mean that it was 7.2% for the year, nor does it state that anywhere in that report. To assume so is just creative math. In addition, stated directly in the report you cite, is that it reflects Personal Disposable Income - NOT wage …   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?