.
Feedback

Hultgren Opposes Fiscal Cliff Legislation

Republican cites failure to address spending as reason for opposition.

Although the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly supported a Senate-backed bill to avert the so-called "fiscal cliff," Rep. Randy Hultgren, who represents Yorkville and Kendall County, opposed the legislation. 

Hultgren, a Republican, said he did not support the bill that raised income taxes on high-earning Americans, because it did not address spending cuts. Calling it "indefensible," Hultgren said the package "makes the 16 trillion dollar debt and trillion dollar deficit even worse."

“I’ve already voted against raising taxes on all Americans, and I cannot support an irresponsible bill which doesn’t begin to address the problem that got us into this mess in the first place," Hultgren said in a released statement. “H.R. 8 addresses several significant issues, including tax rates for families. It repeals the Community Living Assistance Services and Supports (CLASS) Act. It includes an extension of parity for employer-provided transit benefits, which is something I’ve fought for repeatedly. Most importantly, it makes current tax rates permanent for individuals earning less than $400,000 and families earning less than $450,000. That must happen, but not in the absence of any effort to rein in spending.

The bill passed the House 257 to 167. According to The Washington Post the measure "would let the top tax rate rise immediately from 35 percent to 39.6 percent on income over $450,000 for married couples and $400,000 for single people."

Although the bill will protect middle income families from an increase in income taxes, the legislation passed Tuesday night will not stave off an increase in payroll taxes. A 2 percent payroll tax cut passed during the economic downturn expired Dec. 31. According to Bloomberg the average increase would be $1,635. The increase will impact approximately 80 percent of households with incomes between $50,000 and $200,000, Bloomberg reported. 

R Hagberg January 2, 2013 at 09:47 am
You are the man. You have my full support.
JPauly January 2, 2013 at 11:12 am
I'm very pleased Hultgren and 166 of his fellow extremists are in the minority. Hopefully 2014 will clean more of them out. I know this district was the sacrificial lamb when the new boundaries were drawn, but if it's for the greater good of the American people, I'll take it.
David Edelman January 2, 2013 at 12:06 pm
To date; NO Statement on Newtown but will give them on taxes. Yes, it's time for a new congressman who must have better priorities who understands the words "compromise" and most of all "compassion".
Cattlehauler January 2, 2013 at 03:29 pm
Yep better start Networking all the Business Friends for a New Job come re-election time. People in your district are getting tired of your game plan that does not fit the needs for these tough times. I'm gonna enjoy watching the Republican Party Flame Out!
Lori Lee January 2, 2013 at 03:37 pm
Radical Randy representing Grover Norquist rather than the voters of Illinois. We're better off to just pay him to stay home. Stay in the truck and don't mess with the radio.
Ron Moos January 2, 2013 at 11:27 pm
As a life long Rep I believe that there comes a time to COMPROMISE. This was a good time to do it & you failed. I am getting disgruntled with the Reparty after 70 years.
Kevin Wagner January 3, 2013 at 09:24 pm
His only comments are after the fact. He takes no leadership role. Just another contributor to the disenfranchisement of the people of the state of Illinois.
Chewy January 4, 2013 at 12:49 am
I'm happy with his vote against tax increases without spending reform. And everyone should have to bear some of the tax increase when it happens.
wiu85 January 4, 2013 at 01:20 pm
Can't win for losing, regardless of your opinion on raising taxes, it seems odd that we would villify Randy for not voting. Without appropriate time to read the bill, it seems that any vote would be irresponsible. Was the passing better for everyone, only time will tell. I am not for cutting benefits on entitlement programs for those who are recieving them, I am not for taking money from those in need. But we/they (the elected officials) have to eliminate waste and cut our spending. Another downgrade will impact borrowing rates that will effect our spending even more. Senator Joe Manchin (hope Correct) Democrat from West Virginia, in an interview said the government could save $1.5 Trillion over the next 10 years just cleaning up the wasteful spending with entitlement programs, that is not cutting benefits. Which would raise more revenue that what the President campaigned on. The victims of Hurricane Sandy need help, but is it prudent for elected officials to use the tragedy to spend more taxpayer money on their pet projects. We are borrowing $6 Billion a day to pay our bills, at some point it has to end, or our children and grandchildren don't stand a chance. I am not sure what the right answer is, but I would be willing to guess that some fiscal responsiblity and elimination of waste would go a long way to getting things back in order financially. If the people they represent are tightening their belts, why doesn't our government.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Yorkville Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Karen Foley June 15, 2013 at 10:00 pm
The signage on 47 does say stadium seating :-)
What a Deal! June 16, 2013 at 12:46 pm
Thank you Karen. I only go thru Yorkville once every few weeks anymore (only when I absolutely haveRead More to!!) due to construction (?) and have not even seen the sign. Thanks for your clarification!! Stadium seating is definitely a plus!
jill dillon June 12, 2013 at 02:52 am
Is this still available?
Laura Hart June 12, 2013 at 10:41 am
Yes, it is available. (: