Yorkville to Phase Out Insurance for Elected Officials
Health insurance packages will not be offered to newly elected officials, but those who win reelection can keep insurance they may have under plan floated by Mayor Golinski.
Yorkville will phase out health insurance for elected officials under a plan adopted by city alderman Tuesday night.
The question of insurance for elected officials has been a controversial topic since 2011 when Ward 4 Alderman Diane Teeling suggested looking at the policy before the next election.. While controversial, the city could not change the terms of benefits, including medical, dental and vision insurance for elected officials during the middle of their elected terms, but could address them for the next board of aldermen. Tuesday night’s council meeting was the last meeting council could act on the insurance question before the spring election.
Mayor Gary Golinski said he did not think it was right to strip elected officials who use the insurance package of their benefits. He said the best plan was to phase out the insurance package, with no new members of the city council would be eligible. However, current board members who used the plan and won re-election would still be able to receive the insurance.
Aldermen approved the health insurance plan in 2007, which costs the city $121,955 for medical, dental and vision insurance for seven of the 11 eligible officials last fiscal year. Yorkville spent more than $250,000 on health, dental and vision insurance for its elected officials from 2007-2011, according to information Yorkville Patch received through a Freedom of Information Act request.
Alderman Jacquelyn Milschewski proposed an amendment to eliminate access to insurance when the aldermen completed their current terms of office.
“If you run for another term and get reelected, it will be over… otherwise. the program could go on for years,” Milschewski said.
Her amendment, as well as one offered by Alderman Larry Kot to sunset the insurance program in 2017, were both defeated.
Golinski, who voted against Kot’s amendment to break a tie vote, said he believed his proposal was the “fairest way” to deal with the insurance issue.
“It’s going to get done, it just may take a little bit longer,” Golinski said. “I think this is the fairest way to deal with this.”
Elected officials also opposed a plan floated by the mayor to provide a $2,000 increase to the salaries of aldermen and the mayor. The proposed raises would not have impacted the current board of aldermen, but would go into effect after the next local election. Officials have not approved a hike in compensation for elected city officials since 2007.
Yorkville’s mayor is paid $8,500 a year, plus $100 for each City Council meeting he or she attends, according to city code. Aldermen get $3,600, plus the $100 per City Council meeting.
Golinski said he thinks council members deserve the increase given all the work they do for the city.
Kot said local public officials are underpaid, but said the mayor’s proposal was too much money. He said city employees only received a 2.1 percent raise after several years of a salary freeze, but the mayor’s proposal was an increase of nearly 20 percent.
“It’s just too much. I can’t see supporting this,” he said.
While the aldermen did not support increasing their own pay, they supported a token payment of $135 for attending “special” city council meetings to the mayor, aldermen, treasurer, clerk and deputy clerk who attends.
Aldermen also approved raising the pay of the deputy city clerk to $4,900 plus $100 per meeting attended and compensation for a deputy treasurer to $4,900. The city does not currently have a deputy treasurer.
Julane Burdo Johnson
7:32 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Thank you city council for thinking of the taxpayers and not increasing your salaries and phasing out the health insurance which officials most likely have access to already. I appreciate the effort. I would have to agree with Mayor Golinski that elected city officials do a lot of work for the salary they are given.
Reasonable Conservative
8:37 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Excellent. This is all we ask. A city counsel that serves our community, not themselves. It is an honor to be elected. The trust and faith of the people has been given through their vote and it ought never be taken lightly. I hope this is a sign of more excellent decisions to come.
Dan
10:12 am on Wednesday, November 14, 2012
The article failed to show who was in favor of this and who was against. The Aldermen who are getting the health insurance now voted to keep it for themselves. Voting to keep insurance were, Alderman Colosimo, Spears, Munns and Funkhouser. The Aldermen who are not getting it voted save the tax payers money, no strings attached. It appears some Aldermen are voting for their best interest and others are voting for the taxpayers best interest.
It all comes out in the wash
9:46 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
Dan I agree and the voters should do something about it come this election. I'm glad the mayor put this on the agenda as I have tried over the past year and a half to get this addressed. It was the Deception that I would no longer stand for. It started with the "WHO" hiding behind HIPPA, then when some were asked directly continued to hide it. Then when the state said you can't hide behind HIPPA give up the names Out comes the Oh we work 30 hours a week to meet the insurance requirement of part time. They think the citizens of this city can't add I guess. Do the Math ! Come election time the voters should step up. As an Elected Official you put the CITY and the people who support this city (Police, city workers) and its infrastructure First. And remember this came about when Rose was Mayor Protem. Alderman Milschewski, Kot,Teeling and Koch who voted in the best interest of the taxpayers thank you. Respect is something gained, Honesty and Ethics are something you have or don't..... In this roll you should have all 3.
Todd Milliron
11:32 am on Thursday, November 15, 2012
This issue of city taxpayer subsidized health insurance, now only for select council members can only be addressed when there is someone else that is willing to run against Yorkville City Council members like Marty Munns who voted in their own self-interest. City voters and property tax payers can decide at the ballot box on April 9, 2013 if they want to continue to employ and pay for Mr. Munns' Health insurance, if and only if someone else ponies up and decides to run.
Candidate Nominating Petitions must be filed at the city clerk's office between Dec. 17 and Dec. 24. 2012.
Signatures needed for ballot slot are:
Yorkville Ward 1 = 40 registered voter signatures within Ward 1
Yorkville Ward 2 = 30 registered voter signatures within Ward 2
Yorkville Ward 3 = 32 registered voter signatures within Ward 3
Yorkville Ward 4 = 38 registered voter signatures within Ward 4
Marty Munns is Yorkville City Council member for Yorkville Ward 3.