patching...
Update: Addicted to Facebook? We're there: www.facebook.com/yorkvillepatch
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATE: Kendall County, Sheriff's Deputy Target of Federal Lawsuit in Oswego Walmart Altercation

Jason and Nicole Thurmond of Montgomery are seeking damages in excess of $400,000 after an incident at Oswego Walmart in February 2012.

 

Almost exactly one year after an off-duty Kendall County Sheriff’s deputy pulled his weapon on a family in line at the Oswego Wal-Mart, the Montgomery couple has filed a federal lawsuit naming the deputy and Kendall County as defendants.

Jason and Nicole Thurmond filed the suit Feb. 4. The incident took place Feb. 5, 2012.

In the suit, which seeks at least $400,000 in damages, the Thurmonds allege Deputy Craig French used excessive force, assaulted the couple and inflicted emotional distress during the incident in which the Thurmonds and French argued over how many items the Thurmonds had brought to a checkout line. The suit also reveals that during the argument French allegedly chided the couple for allegedly being on public assistance. 

Thurmond was charged with battery in the incident after pushing French away from his then nine-months pregnant wife. French then pulled his weapon after being pushed.

Video security tapes of the incident made available to Patch through a Freedom of Information Act request depict a scene of mass confusion, with French only revealing he was a sheriff's deputy after pulling his weapon.

Thurmond was found not guilty in the incident in November.

The suit filed by the Thurmonds also alleges that the Kendall County Sheriff’s office operates a “code of silence” that results in members of the office failing to “report instances of misconduct of which they are aware, including the use of unlawful force, despite their obligation to do so as sworn police officers. This includes police officers who remain silent or give false or misleading information during official investigations into allegations of fellow officer related to misconduct that occurred on duty or off-duty in order to protect themselves or their fellow officers from discipline, criminal prosecution or civil liability.”

Further, the suit alleges the sheriff’s office fails to properly train its deputies and retains unqualified officers.

In a statement posted Wednesday afternoon on the Sheriff's Department's Facebook page, Sheriff Richard Randall said, “The allegations contained in the lawsuit filed against the Kendall County Sheriff’s Office are outrageous, despicable, and untrue. I wanted the citizens of Kendall County to hear this from me first. This is why the link to the lawsuit is posted on our Facebook page.”

On Thursday Sheriff Randall continued to decry the lawsuit on the department's Facebook page, calling it and abuse of the legal system and "legal extortion." Randall claimed Thurmond offered to drop the lawsuit for a payment of $20,000.

"This isn’t about the truth, or about justice for a victim. It’s all about money.” Randall said on Facebook. “It’s time someone speaks plainly about these types of lawsuits. They are the legal equivalent of extortion.”

In the same post Chief Deputy Scott Koster called the lawsuit "a grab for a quick $20,000 from the taxpayers of Kendall County.”

A copy of the Federal Complaint is attached to this article. 

Related Topics: Craig French, Jason Thurmond, and Oswego Walmart

Daisy Doe

7:05 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

This is why the number of jury trials have gone up in the county. People aren't standing for it anymore and won't be bullied by this County or the States Attorney's office.

Reply

Concerned long time resident

7:55 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

i would really like to hear both sides of the story, I find this and most law suite frivolous and believe the couple is looking for easy money from the citizens of Kendal County.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Grandpamike

10:17 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

@concerned

You state that you would really like to hear both sides of the story, yet, you make a judgement without hearing to both sides. Seems to me that you are implying something else in your response.

Patch Reader

7:58 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I witnessed this and do not find it at all frivolous. The Deputy fully abused his right to carry a weapon and there should be consequences for his actions.

Reply

Lance Stevens

8:04 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

More and more we read about this Sheriff's department being out of control and reckless.. Sexual Harassment Lawsuits, spending taxpayer money on Beer for boat trips on the Illinois River...irresponsible use of force in a grocery store. Lots of allegations.. There's a election soon...its time for some new ideas and new blood at the top..

Reply

MidwestGal

8:06 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

There are two side to every story, but I tend to think if the wife is 9 months pregnant, getting into a fight at Walmart with and egodriven cop was the furthest thing on her mind. Frivolous - maybe, but Thurmond was found innocent. Cop was off duty, there was no robbery - only a man protecting his wife from a angry-walmartian.

Reply

Becky

8:19 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

$400k in damages and emotional distress? I totally agree that the officer acted ridiculously and totally abused his rights to carry (as well as his pledge to protect and serve.... not harass and harm) but seeking $400k as retribution?? I'm sorry, but now you're just proving yourself to be yet another sue-happy American. Congratulations, you're just as much of a tool as Officer French. $400,000.... give me a break.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cheryl Knuth-Hayward

9:11 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I agree with becky sue-happy all the time makes me really angry I would of been behind them until I saw this 400k in damages, really people If they get the money I hope they get off welfare!

Comment_arrow

michael a tkach

9:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

400k sounds like a lot of money,but awards like that might change the minds of the voters who keep voting for randall,he has cost the tax payers of kendall county many thousands of dollars for the actions of his out of control department.

Comment_arrow

Dan S

10:22 pm on Sunday, March 3, 2013

And how much would you like them to ask for then to please your lordship Becky? The all knowing fairness seeker surely must know what is enough.

gater

8:27 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

concerned you can think this is frivolous if you like .but French does have the right to remain silent .so if he would have kept his mouth shut this would not have happened but he has a badge and a gun no balls who goes after a pregnant woman .and Randall thinks this is outrageous he should have been voted out last election just like the states atty

Reply

gater

8:29 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

sorry it should say states atty should have been voted out last election

Reply

Mel

9:08 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I am so sick and tired of people using the legal system to get money that they are not capable of or willing to work and achieve for themselves. The bottom line is that both parties were at fault at some point. Officer French should have not said what he did, but Mr. Thurmond shouldn't have shoved and done what he did either. I'm sure all of us have had someone say something not so nice to us at some point, but we didn't shove and start a fight and then turn around and sue. Officer French is an off duty officer with the right to carry his gun off duty. He has the right to pull his gun if he feels threatened. For all he knew Mr. Thurmond could have had a knife, a gun or seriously harm him with his hands. Mr. Thurmond needs to think twice before putting his hands on someone else. Emotional distress...My a@@!! He just wants the tax payers to pay out and I'm sick of it. He's not distressed....He just wants his money!! I'm sure he hasn't spent a dime seeking psychological/professional help for his "emotional distress", but he sure has seeked help with trying get his money!!

Reply

Neal d

9:16 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

While I don't know all the facts in this whole case. I also do believe that if it were a civilian who pulled a gun in a Walmart they would be in jail. Also this case should have been moved to a different county because its an unwritten rule that the cops all protect themselves. Kendall county has to be the worst county to live in while there's some decent cops I've had my share of issues with them and them wanting to prove themselves. If I could sell my house now I'd move out of Kendall! While 400k is excessive. It's also no different than the lady that spilled coffee on her and won a million from McDonald's. I don't believe at all the cop was in enough danger to pull a weapon. This is just my opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Sayin

11:24 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Couldn't agree more Neal d! Kendall Co police are terrible! Just this Tuesday, very early in the morning, AFTER it had rained all day Monday and very icy conditions on Tuesday morning, I had a Kendall Co stop me in my subdivision for rolling through a stop sign!! WOW horrible road conditions and he is worried about me stopping at a stop sign in my own subdivision! They should have done something about French instead of just dusting it under the rug. I was very surprised to learn Kendall did nothing to this person who pulled out a gun in a store full of customers. Just another day in Kendall County...

Daisy Doe

9:19 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Here's the thing - we wouldn't even be talking about this had the sheriff's dept. done the right thing, dropped the charges, and reprimanded French. They chose to let this case (misdemeanor) go to a jury trial. 12 people heard this case and decided he was not guilty! How much did the jury trial cost us taxpayers? I doubt these people would have sued but to see French as the spokesman for this department after his actions was sickening! I would've done the same thing the Thurmond's are doing and it wouldn't have been about the money!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CJ

12:48 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I agree with all you said Daisy!

katie

9:31 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Why is the sheriff posting and defending himself on Facebook. A proper response would have been they do not comment on pending litigation or no comment. Just another unprofessional move. What is despicable is an off duty officer is an off duty officer saying something about the number if items in a cart and allowing the matter to get escelated to the point of pulling his gun. He was defending the public how?

Reply

gater

9:42 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

none of this would have happened if French would have kept his mouth shut the sheriffs deserves what it gets the money should come from French not the tax payers

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daisy Doe

9:47 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Couldn't agree with you more! I don't always like standing in line at Walmart waiting and I've had people run out of line to get something they forgot without going postal. I stood there waiting patiently like most normal people do. Did I like it? NO! Did I act like an idiot and start badgering the person? NO! It's called self control!

russ harrison

9:48 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

400K is not excessive in my opinion. If Lt French assaulted my wife and then pulled a gun, and I was arrested and then found not guilty,I'd be suing for a heck of a lot more than $400,000 dollars. A small amount of 40K probably would not curtail the type of behavior on the part of Sherrif Randal and Deputy French, but 400K certainly should send the message to the Sheriff that this type of behavior from his deputies will not be tolerated. Witnesses statements contradicted the arguments set forth by the police and state attorney, and the jury found the man not guilty. No amount of money will replace the dignity lost by this type of arrest and "prosecutorial thuggery" (quoted from Chief Justice of Illinois Otis Harrison in his Tribune interview denouncing illegal and unethical actions taken by police and prosecutors to gain convictions).
The SA and the Sherriffs normally do a bang up job, but in this case they screwed the pooch royally and should be forced to make amends. Besides, asking 400K doesn't mean they'll settle for that, but its a nice spot to work down from. Seriously, how impudent can an organization be to retain Lt French as spokesperson after this incident? That was just stupidity on Randal's part. How could the SA even think they could get a conviction to begin with?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lance Stevens

9:57 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

well Russ, it was likely because they feared this lawsuit if they would have dropped it.. You can bet the Sheriff (or someone he ordered) had something to do with the continued prosecution in this case.. If you remember correctly when Terry Tichava was first accused of Sexual harrassment, the sheriff staunchly defended him. It wasn't until the sheriff was concerned about his political future, did he encourage Tichava to resign. The buck stops at the top... It's time for a change..

Comment_arrow

michael a tkach

9:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

do you know mr thurmund,because if not,maybe you should grt some facts before you bad wrap him.

Barbara

10:28 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I fear for anybody who happens to run into this sheriff's officer, If he can't keep his gun in his holster in the express line at Walmart. He sounds dangerous, I agree if a civilian pulled a gun in a similar situation, civilian would be charged, but this police officer walks away with his job?? We are marching in the express line right to police run state...

Reply
Comment_arrow

JPauly

9:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Word Barbara. The cop was agitated and pulled his weapon before fully identifying himself. Fast forward to the time when conceal and carry is going to be legal in IL. Now take some cowboy identifying the cop as a threat.

How many other lives would have been put in harms way? The cop should have kept his mouth shut in line and chalked it up as serving someone else by letting them through.

Evelyn Santiago

11:24 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Sometimes the only way to send a message is to go for the pocketbook. It was an over the top reaction to something that most of us would ignore. How many times have you been in an express line and there has been someone in front with more items than posted. Sometimes its an honest mistake and they did not realize they had to many items. Whatever the case, most balanced human beings would just wait it out or either change to a different lane.

Life is full of minor things like this on a daily basis so if those that we trust to protect us can't deal with minor things like too many items in a checkout lane how will they react when they pull us over for a traffic infraction or something more serious.

Pulling a gun out in this situation was way over the top. Will he shoot first in a simple verbal altercation when he is on duty? As a citizen of Kendall County I want a law enforcement leader to take that role seriously and instead of trying to cover up a situation to protect the citizens from officers that may for whatever reason be too willing to use excessive force whether they are on duty or off duty.

Hard to feel safe when those that are paid to protect us turn on us. The sheriff's office either needs a new leader or a public relations officer that can make the right recommendations to the Sheriff to mitigate the damages that their actions will cause in situations like this. Risk management is part of any business whether private or public.

Reply

Melissa Gould

11:50 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Some cop with an authority complex, who got that bent out if shape over how many items they had in the check out line?!? Sounds like someone could use done sensitivity training and anger management for sure! Have I been irritated because someone decides to take a cart full of items into the 12 items or less line? Of course! But seriously, if you didn't like it, go to another line. It happens everyday. And who cares, and for that matter why is it anyone's business if they are getting public assistance?!? The man was defending his pregnant wife!!! Good for him!!! And is it common practice that an OFF DUTY officer carries his gun around? I have nothing but respect for the dedicated officers that go out everyday and protect us, but cops like this are exactly why I have great disdain for local law enforcement.

Reply

anonymous

11:59 am on Thursday, February 21, 2013

The 400k will be paid for by the taxpayers just like anything associated with the cops-what do they care?

Reply

Jeff Law

12:07 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

This Sheriff has been around long enough, in the last election a lot of stuff was brought out to the public. He brags how he is out in Washington solving national crime problems, he should focus on who is paying him, us Kendall County. Keep your house clean. He said this was his last term, we will see. I bet his Command staff will want him to run again to protect them, to be continued. I am still waiting to see who the "unnamed male supervisors" from the recent sexual harassment lawsuits are, that will be very telling. Overdue change is the headline here.

Reply

Katt

12:20 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I read the earlier articles. Supposedly Mrs. Thurmond, at the front of the line, forgot eggs. The Thurmond's decided their time was more valuable than others so held up the line while her husband went to the back of the store to get them. Everyone had to wait for the Thurmond's to complete their shopping while checking out.
Why don't the Thurmond's drag Walmart into their lawsuit if they want big money? Let's see...say there is no clear store regulation about being ready to check out at the front of the line, realizing that you forgot an item and then forcing others in line to wait for you to complete your order while you send a family member to the back of the store to get it. Say that this must be announced to every customer, signs and announcements must be in every language as well as English. Once a customer is at the front of the line, he/she can only purchase what is in their cart or basket; no running through the store for another item. Physical, psychological and emotional distress was caused since store policy is unclear and lax on this issue.
*sigh*
Dep French was off duty with the legal right to carry. He should have been relieved of his weapon, badge, counseled and put through an investigation, then cleared or not cleared. IMO, this is a frivolous lawsuit against Kendall County for 400K. Judge should toss it.The Thurmond's could sue Dep. French in civil court. I don't think that taxpayers should be held accountable.Taxpayers are the losers in this lawsuit.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daisy Doe

12:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

We were the losers when we had to foot the bill for the jury trial.

Walt Hines

12:24 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

If this is going to a jury can't they award him more? $400,000 might not be so bad if a jury decides to give him a million. Maybe an attorney who works in this county could way in on this.

Why can't people leave their attitudes and bad behavior at home?

Reply

People Person

12:25 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Well taxpayers should demand better police officers, sherrifs, and a state's attorney if they're tired of fronting the bill for misconduct. I hope the couple get every last bit that they're suing for.

Reply

woody

12:37 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

woody
I believe that this incident shows the lack of common sense in todays world. Look at this case and try to find one person that has made a decision that makes any sense.
Pulling out a gun in a situation that only requires a little patience is the act of an undertrained officer, retaining that officer is a decision that must have been made on emotion, not public safety. Mr. French needs to be let go, Mr. Randall needs to resign and Mr. Thurmond needs get off public assistance and do whatever it takes to support his family, be a man.

Reply

Father of 2 teenagers

1:42 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Hey Just Sayin,
So you think the sheriff is bad because he didn't overlook you running a stop sign when there was ice on the road? How can you justify that? You admit you rolled through the stop sign then complain you got a ticket? He's doin his job. Just because you don't think it was a big deal doesn't mean he's a bad sheriff. You seem to think the fact it was Ivey gives you the right to blow the stop sign. I think that is all the more reason to stop. If there's another car at the intersection you are going to cause them to slam on the brakes and possibly lose control. Regardless, there's a sign, you stop. It doesn't mean "stop only if you think you need to", that's what a yield sign means. I see people like you every day, yes, even in my subdivision! Why does it matter where you are? Would you prefer to hit a neighbor? Too many people come to a stop sign and have no intention of stopping UNTIL they see a car coming, then stop halfway into the intersection. Your attitude and those like you just kill me. Then you blame the sheriff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Just Sayin

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

A lot of assumptions in your comment...

Katt

3:05 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I think it will be settled out of court for any amount up to $400K.
Attorney wouldn't have taken the case (usually on a contingency basis) unless he/she thought they would get paid decent money.
After attorney takes their 18-30% fee off the top of the settlement, Thurmond's get the rest of the money. It could be anywhere up to the $400K minus attorney fees. Might even be more, depending on the settlement and Judge.
Since emotional distress can cause physical symptoms the Thurmond's will not have to pay the IRS any taxes on their settlement $$ either.
Thurmond's can still use their EBT for food stamps and continue other welfare they receive (Medicaid etc) since the lump sum they will get, no matter how much, is not considered to be monthly income. Their lump sum settlement $$ won't count as income.
Win-win for Thurmonds. Win-Win attorneys. Lose-lose taxpayers.
Nice payout for the Mrs. who forgot eggs and her take a swing husband! Taxpayers paid for their food that day and will for a long time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daisy Doe

3:25 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

You still miss the point. We wouldn't even be here had the Sheriff's office done the right thing like I said before. If you had read any of the articles about this you would know that Mr. Thurmond was employed so you assuming they were on Medicaid is overstepping. I know that he did lose hours over this, or that's what he stated in one of the earlier articles, so any hope of them trying to get off the welfare was lost. Why are you trying to sidetrack people with the welfare issue? Which I don't think has anything do with this at all. If the deputy can't control himself over something like this he needs to go. Like I stated up above we've all waited in line and I'm sure 90% of us have had this happen without incident or the need to badger the individual. Give me a break!

Sheila Raddatz

3:35 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Seriously, there were more victims that just this one lawsuit. Bringing out a gun and shouting "everyone to the ground" on a busy shopping day is insane. The officer should have lost his right to carry at that point. End of story. I knew this store very well at the time and every employee and every customer were on edge for at least a week after this incident. Anytime someone raised their voice or they heard a loud noise, people reacted in a startled way.

I was not in the building but a person called me WHILE this was all going down and they called me out of sheer panic trying to find an exit door. Try being on the receiving end of that phone call (like I was) and I am sure some opinions would change.....

Reply

Renee

4:35 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

I am deeply concerned for how women are treated by "unnamed male supervisors" at the Kendall County Sheriffs department, 2 recent lawsuits. Now a deputy approaches a women and argues about eggs in a walmart line. Why did the deputy wait and say something to the women when the man walked away? What about saying something to the man? Seems to me there is a pattern of treatment here...

Reply

Renee

4:49 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Serious question, I would think the attorneys looked at the oswego police department and how they arrested mr. thurmond and if the oswego officers did something wrong they would have sued oswego. Does not make sense if this lawsuit is about grabbing money they just name kendall county sheriff. I thought Baird to another job?

Reply

susan spillman

4:55 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

@Renee I agree!!!! Seems women are treated differently by the Sheriff department. Did I read something about some alcohol in the jail?

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Steven Jack

5:07 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

Comments have been removed from this thread because they violate our terms of use. To see our terms of use click here: http://yorkville.patch.com/terms

Reply

Win Some Lose Some

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Bet this isn't how Mr. Baird anticipated his campaign for Sheriff to start .........right in the gutter!!

Reply

Katt

7:32 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

@Daisy Doe -
If the Thurmond's were, or are, on Medicaid, they can continue it as well as their EBT SNAP, etc. since any settlement $$ received will not be considered monthly income. No one is going to take away their SNAP or other assistance, Dais, plus settlement $$ Judge awards won't be taxed. They can continue to buy, or forget to buy, lots of stuff.
As far as the Sheriff's Dept, my earlier post said: "Dep French was off duty with the legal right to carry. He should have been relieved of his weapon, badge, counseled and put through an investigation, then cleared or not cleared." This is my opinion. Maybe in the future, the particulars of this case and the costs incurred will change up dept. protocol. Maybe not.
My point: Any settlement $$ the Thurmond's receive will be at taxpayer expense. Attorneys get paid (at taxpayer expense.) Thurmond's win at taxpayer's expense. Taxpayers lose.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jo Madre

9:24 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

@Katt,

I've wanted to comment on many of the posts so far, but for some reason, yours called out to me.

First of all, they didn't "forget" to buy eggs and then go running through the store to get them. They had eggs, but the cashier told them they were the wrong eggs for the WIC program and told them to go get the right eggs. If the cashier had been thinking, maybe she/he would have suspended the sale until the eggs were back so she/he could continue checking out other people until the eggs were back, but that didn't happen.Oh well. It's no reason to get angry and abusive.

Whether the Thurmonds continue to get welfare really isn't and shouldn't be an issue here. Perhaps they have a collective conscience, and they will refuse welfare once they get a settlement. We don't know. But let's not assume the worst. It just makes us look judgmental.

You and many others seem to think people shouldn't be able to fight against the abuses of power because it will cost the taxpayers money. That's what I have issue with. When someone in power abuses that power like Mr. French allegedly did, someone needs to pay. Perhaps if the sheriff's office had done the right thing from the beginning and suspended or fired Mr. French and/or dropped the charges against Mr. Thurmond (who was found not guilty), then this law suit never would have happened.

Chill about the taxpayer dollars. That's not what this is or should be about.

Daisy Doe

9:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

@Katt we lost when this misdemeanor case went to jury trial. It should have never gone that far. The states attorney lost this case and we the taxpayers paid for it. Could Katt stand for Kendall attorney like the ones who work at the court house?

Reply

michael a tkach

9:03 pm on Thursday, February 21, 2013

the kendall co sheriff,s dept is out of control,and it starts at the top,sheriff randall needs to go,the citizens of kendall county do not deserve a police department that operates like this.i am 58 years old,and am a retired fireman,so i worked hand and hand with police during my career,i have never seen this type of power abuse in a police dept in my life,until i moved into kendall county.i only hope the citizens wake up before the next election.

Reply

Tyler Foley

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Oh please $400,000? That is a little too much you think!? I would understand $10,000... I think they are going over the top with $400,000... I was wondering would this effect the county? $400,000 out of the budgets? Would that mean there will be cuts?

Reply

Tina Conley

6:19 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

How about the officer that pulls over a gang member with loaded weapons in his car, or the first officer on the scene who revives an infant who has stopped breathing? The cop that pulls over some idiot driving 75 mph drunk down Route 71, or the cop that stands in front of the high school directing traffic every morning in all types of weather? Let's show some respect people.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mel

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I agree...I'm sick and tired of people complaining and degrading these officers. They do a great job in my opinion. They don't carry their gun just to protect other, but also to protect themselves. If you show them respect, then they will treat you with respect in return. Ask a thug/gang member from our surrounding counties....They will say that they don't want any part of Kendall County. To me that's a good thing and I thank our officers for that. I've actually have asked some not so good of kids in my friends neighborhood in Aurora and they won't even think about coming this way!! Thank you Thank you to Oswego PD and the Sheriff's Department!!

Comment_arrow

michael a tkach

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

respect is earned,not give.when they take the job,they accept the risks,just as i did as a firefighter.when sworn officers abuse the power vested in them,it,s hard to respect them,im not saying all the kendall county deputy,s are bad,but some do have a im god complex and they know they will not be punished for doing wrong,this has already een established .they will arrest people who have not broken any laws.as i said earlier,the department is out of control,from the top on down.

Mel

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I've gone my whole life never getting arrested or rarely getting pulled over for traffic violations. I'm far from perfect, but I've never put myself around people or things that would get me arrested. I can't fatham ever saying anything bad about our police, fire department and veterans. They do things daily to help us lead a good/safe life. If you truly don't like or respect them, then don't call them when you need help.They all handle dangerous and horrific situtations that I'm sure few of us are capable of or would ever want to do for their pay. Was this Walmart situation bad, yes, but not just because of Officer French. Mr. Thurmond was also at fault and he needs to learn to accept his role in this mess. He should get NOTHING!! If you don't like the Sheriff, then vote for someone else. If you want "better" officers, then pay more for them so they can hire the best of the best and be able to pay for continued training. If you don't like the police, then I'm sure you are not doing something good. Move into the lovely city of Chicago and let me know how that works for ya!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jo Madre

9:24 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

Mel, there is a huge difference between the "good" officers (and I'm sure there are plenty) and the "bad" officers who abuse their power.

Mr. Thurmond was found not guilty. Mr. French should NOT have pulled his gun out and kept it out for many minutes, freaking out many people in the store. And he shouldn't have (allegedly) shot his mouth off, calling the couple names and acting in a threatening way.

The fact that he pulled his gun without announcing he was a cop because he was pushed is excessive force, period. Mr. Thurmond was defending his pregnant wife against someone who was allegedly threatening her. I'm not saying he should have pushed the guy away, but I think many men would do the same thing if a stranger was calling their pregnant wives names and moving so close to her that she felt threatened.

Good cops exist. This is true. And they deserve all the respect in the world for what they do. But bad cops exist too, and they need to be disciplined and shown the door. The good ol' boys club and the history of cops protecting their own even when they are doing illegal things has to stop. It's this abuse of power that can give even the good cops a bad name.

Comment_arrow

woody

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Mel, your missing the point. This officer pulled out his weapon without identifying himself first......over someone having to many items in an express lane. Where is the composure? Where is the problem solving skills? I want Kendall County to be a safe place for my family aswell but this behavior is unacceptable, and on top of the poor choice made by the officer, the sheriff did not even fire the guy. The good ol boy mantality needs to go in Kendall County, our taxes are out of control and now the county will have to pay out for the stupid actions of this cop. Give me a break

gater

8:51 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

tina I will give respect when it is due kendall co sheriffs deserves none sexual harassment twice would you like to work there how about next time you put to many items in your cart some one sticks a gun in your face respect no

Reply

Oswego Mom

9:24 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

while it may seem litigious, I feel the thurmonds have been wrongly harrassed for long enough by the Kendall County Court system. Nearly a year of their life has been bogged down by this. The deputy was clearly wrong for pulling a gun. The amount they're seeking? Really? They have to live with this whole matter the rest of their lives. And it sends a message to off-duty cops whose egos might get out of control: you can't get away with this behavior. You are not the law, you uphold the law. I have a tremendous amount of respect for law enforcement officials - what they do and deal with most of us don't have a clue. But when you cross the line - and this *one* did, there ought to be a penalty. And this penalty will send a message to other law *enforcement* agents that they are not, in fact, above the law they uphold. Serve and protect. Not bully and belittle.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Daisy Doe

9:49 am on Friday, February 22, 2013

I agree, people assume because we're sticking up for the Thurmond's that we don't respect the police. Nothing could be farther from the truth. I have great respect for our men and women in uniform, it's the abuse I don't go along with.

Jeff Law

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

@win/lose some. I do not recall that Baird is running for Sheriff, unless I missed a news article. I read about a Plano person running.

Reply

John Brown

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

The sad fact is that the migration of people who inhabited Chicago's torn down CHA high rise projects has also brought a migration of crime, rude and ignorant behavior and frivolous lawsuits brought by people who are experts at "playing the system". Their lawyers have followed. The people commenting on the officers actions have no idea what transpired or what type of threat the officer perceived. If Mr. Thurmond stated or implied in any manner that he was armed, "I'll kill you, ______!", while placing his hand near his waistband or small of back, for example, justifies the officers response. Law enforcement officers are justified in a situation such as this when they reasonably perceived the person could possibly be armed, or fear great bodily harm to theirselves or others. The people here, including myself, were not there and we can only speculate what occurred but people's lack of understanding of the actual issues here and their emotional responses to a gun being pointed at someone in a grocery store they frequent seem to further cloud people's snap judgements.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ALMJR

11:49 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

You talk about people not knowing what happened but then you speculate that the couple migrated from Chicago, bringing crime AND that Thurmond threatened to kill Officer French, Incredibly that didn't make into the trial. Yes, most of us weren't there but at least one commenter was and she indicated the cop was out of line. We have a video of the incident and we can see what happened. A jury of our peers found Thurmond not guilty. Those are facts.

Katt

1:08 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

Taxpayers have been on the hook for many outrageous lawsuits and it has to end now. Frankly, the State of IL and it's taxpayers simply don't have the money to pay for suits such as this one.
Illinois is broke. We all know it. The 67% tax increase that was supposed to be "temporary" is now in discussion as a permanent 'fix' which, as we all know,won't really fix anything. It still isn't enough.
Scroll through and read some of this information if you want to see how bad it really is:
http://illinoispolicy.org/search/index.asp?searchfield=Budget&Taxes&Submit=Submit

IMO if the Thurmond's feel the overwhelming need to sue it should be in civil court against Dep French only. If the Judge awards a settlement, Dep French would be the one making the lump sum payment or monthly payments to them through a court order. The courts need to be part of the solution, not the problem. Frivolous lawsuits need to end.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ALMJR

11:49 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

It's been over a YEAR since this happened and the sheriff's department still refuses to release it's internal investigation of French. I think they need to be in this lawsuit.

Stephen Youhanaie

8:02 pm on Friday, February 22, 2013

I was there. I told the investigator (Joe Janosz) my take. I do not believe Thurmond is suffering. His wife probably is. French was clearly agitated, while Thurmond was in control of himself, however Thurmond's wife was weeping. I do not see this as a $400,000 item, but it's not a money grab either.

Reply

John Brown

10:03 am on Saturday, February 23, 2013

Stephen, You are obviously a naïve babe-in-the-woods when it comes to this type of scam. You sound like the PERFECT Cook County juror.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Stephen Youhanaie

12:04 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

So, your weak attempt nt trying to insult me makes you feel good? Why don't you come up with something constructive to say?

Comment_arrow

ALMJR

11:49 am on Tuesday, March 5, 2013

Riiight, total scam. Thurmond and his wife lured French to that line, knowing he would pull his gun in a crowded store so they could get money. Genius!

(I notice you keep bringing up Chicago and Cook county. Not hard to speculate why)

Dock Ellis

10:29 am on Friday, March 1, 2013

The current sheriff is old and arrogant. He needs to call it quits before the voters do it for him.

And John Brown, I do not care for your not-so-thinly veiled racist assumptions.

Reply

James RedWhiteandFree

9:58 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013

Seems like typical law enforcement abuse. He had no business pulling a gun or even starting an altercation for that matter. I see people in 20 items or less checkout all the time with too many items, but I don't start altercations over it. If anyone else pulled a gun on someone for such a stupid reason (being pushed) they'd be in jail. Ridiculous. I want the name of their attorney. APD threatened to kill me last August for comitting no crime and the APD insists on ignoring it.

Reply

Leave a comment